🪰512,693 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

CHOPSTIX

6045 26 ST W, BRADENTON, FL 34207

License #5104523

🥡 Chinese ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

CHOPSTIX in BRADENTON currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 93.6 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on February 4, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 12 total violations — 1 major, 11 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Imported observations
12
Coverage note
Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
  • When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [08B-38-4] Food stored on floor.observed in walk-in cooler a bag of carrots stored on floor. Person in charge removed from floor.
  • [35B-03-4] Outer openings not protected with self-closing doors. Observed: Outer openings not protected with self-closing door on East side of Building. As a repeat violation the importance of following proper protocol with this violation was reinforced with the employee
  • [40-06-5] Employee personal items stored in or above a food preparation area, food, clean equipment and utensils, or single-service items.observed in main kitchen area cell phone on food preparation table. Person in charge removed phone and cleaned table.
  • [21-12-4] Wet wiping cloth not stored in sanitizing solution between uses.observed on cooks table wet wiping cloth on food preparation table. Person in charge placed in sanitizer.
  • [14-01-5] Bowl or other container with no handle used to dispense cooked rice. Person in charge removed.
  • [36-37-5] Ceiling not smooth, nonabsorbent and easily cleanable in food preparation, food storage, or warewashing areas. Observed: Ceiling not smooth, nonabsorbent and easily cleanable in food preparation, food storage, or warewashing areas. Ceiling not smooth, nonabsorbent and easily cleanable throughout entire kitchen area. As a repeat violation the importance of following proper protocol with this violation was reinforced with the employee.
  • [13-03-4] Employee with no hair restraint while engaging in food preparation. Employee with no hair restraint while engaging in food preparation. Employee put on hat and washed hands.As a repeat violation, the importance of following proper protocol with this violation was reinforced with the employee.
  • [02C-04-5] Operator is not properly tracking/marking the number of days ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared onsite was held at refrigeration temperatures prior to freezing in order to properly date mark the food when it is thawed and held at refrigeration temperatures again.observed in walk-in cooler cooked pork from freezer not time tracked.Person in charge stated it was pulled from freezer on 2/2/26 and date marked accordingly.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

CHOPSTIX looks fairly solid on paper. Would you eat here?

B record

Solid overall, with enough history that people may still weigh the details differently.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.