CUENELLI'S ROTISSERIE CHICKEN PERUVIAN STYLE

Name: CUENELLI'S ROTISSERIE CHICKEN PERUVIAN STYLE
Address: 4801 W HILLSBOROUGH AVE, TAMPA, FL, 33614, US
Rating: 78.6

4801 W HILLSBOROUGH AVE, TAMPA, FL 33614

License #3916523

🫔 Latin American ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate

78.6 Grade C / 100

Mixed Health Record

How is this score calculated? →

Quick take

CUENELLI'S ROTISSERIE CHICKEN PERUVIAN STYLE in TAMPA currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 78.6 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on March 10, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 16 total violations — 2 critical, 5 major, 9 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR

Inspection coverage

100%

Imported observations

Coverage note

Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here

•Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
•When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.

Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

Open in Google Maps ↗ Open in Apple Maps ↗

DBPR

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

Inspection Completed - No Further Action
[14-09-4] Cutting board has cut marks and is no longer cleanable. Observed grooved cutting boards on the front line .
[40-06-5] Employee personal items stored in or above a food preparation area, food, clean equipment and utensils, or single-service items. Backpack and keys on small dessert freezer behind dessert cooler employees moved items to appropriate location .
[42-01-4] Wet mop not stored in a manner to allow the mop to dry. Observed wet mop in mop, bucket, not hung to dry ,operator hung mop to dry during inspection .
[31A-11-4] Handwash sink used for purposes other than handwashing. Observed handwashing on front line, closest to hallway door with cup and sponge , also observed hand, wash sink and back kitchen next to the back door with towels and sink employee removed items from both sinks
[12B-07-4] Employee beverage container on a food preparation table or over/next to clean equipment/utensils. Observed employee drink in back kitchen on prep table next to freezer ,also observed employee drink inside tall reach in cooler next to tall reach in freezer, employee removed both drinks from the areas and discarded.
[31B-04-4] No handwashing sign provided at a hand sink used by food employees. No hand wash sign in mens bathroom , inspector provided operator with hand wash sign, and he hung it up at time of inspection.
[29-34-4] Vacuum breaker missing at hose bibb or on fitting/splitter added to hose bibb in back kitchen next to triple sink , discussed with operator the importance of a vacuum breaker.
[08B-38-4] Food stored on floor. Observed case of whole chickens stored on floor and walk-in cooler, operator removed items off of the floor
[31A-09-4] Handwash sink not accessible for employee use at all times. Handwashing sink in the back kitchen close to exit door was blocked with various items, employee moved items to make sink accessible
[41-10-4] Toxic substance/chemical improperly stored. Observed bottle of Fabuloso cleaning liquid stored over and next to ready to eat items, operator relocated chemicals to appropriate location.

Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse