🪰512,693 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

MCK'S TAVERN

218 S BEACH ST, DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32114

License #7405427

🍺 Bar/Pub ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
68.9 Grade F / 100

Failing Health Score

How is this score calculated? →
Quick take

MCK'S TAVERN in DAYTONA BEACH currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 68.9 out of 100 — an F grade — a serious pattern of repeat or critical violations. This restaurant has 3 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on April 2, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 30 total violations — 7 critical, 6 major, 17 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Imported observations
30
Coverage note
Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • •Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
  • •When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

Open in Google Maps ↗ Open in Apple Maps ↗
DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. -sliced beef 52f ,slice cheese 47f advised to keep a lower level less than 4 hours
  • [09-01-4] Employee touching ready-to-eat food with their bare hands - food was not being heated as a sole ingredient to 145 degrees F or immediately added to other ingredients to be cooked/heated to the minimum required temperature to allow bare hand contact. Establishment has no approved Alternative Operating Procedure. -waitress grab limes with barehands and placed in drink
  • [16-37-1] No chemical test kit provided when using sanitizer at three-compartment sink/warewashing machine or wiping cloths. -chlorine
  • [21-38-4] Wiping cloth sanitizing solution stored on the floor.
  • [36-32-5] Ceiling/ceiling tile shows damage or is in disrepair. -access point not cover on ceiling in kitchen
  • [41-07-4] Container of energy pill improperly stored .
  • [08B-38-4] Food stored on floor. -oil jugs - Tcs soup of floor in walk in cooler gasket- corrected - brewery -containers of grain on floor
  • [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. -hood and filters above char soiled with grease
  • [40-06-5] Employee personal items stored in or above a food preparation area, food, clean equipment and utensils, or single-service items. -Cell phone on prep table
  • [13-04-4] Employee with no beard guard/restraint while engaging in food preparation.
  • [22-02-4] Food-contact surface soiled with food debris, mold-like substance or slime. -can opener
  • [12B-07-4] Employee beverage container on a food preparation table or over/next to clean equipment/utensils. -drinks on counter at wait station by oil and vinegar -drink on prep table kitchen,corrected
  • [36-27-5] Wall soiled with accumulated grease, food debris, and/or dust. -Grease on wall next to char grill
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

MCK'S TAVERN has a rough inspection history. Would you risk it?

F record

A rough inspection history changes the conversation. This vote is a quick read on community trust.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.