MOO!
1917 HOLLYWOOD BLVD, HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020
License #1621447
🍽️ American ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurateSign in to watch restaurants and track them on your watchlist.
Failing Health Score
How is this score calculated? →MOO! in HOLLYWOOD currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 59.3 out of 100 — an F grade — a serious pattern of repeat or critical violations. This restaurant has 3 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on February 13, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 28 total violations — 6 critical, 10 major, 12 minor.
What’s powering this page
InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.
- •Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
- •When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
See the place, then share or verify
*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.
Inspection History
Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.
Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.
- Call Back - Complied
- [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. On prep table at EXPO - individual butters (71F - Cold Holding). Per employee butters out of cooler from 12:00pm. Employee placed butters in beverage reach in cooler by expo station to rechill.
- [05-06-4] Probe thermometer not accurate within plus or minus 2 degrees Fahrenheit. Batteries dead in probe thermometer.
- [10-20-4] In-use tongs stored on equipment door handle between uses. Tongs hanging on oven doors at cookline.
- [11-27-4] Establishment has no written procedures for employees to follow in response to a vomiting or diarrheal event where the vomit or diarrhea is discharged onto surfaces in the establishment. Bulletin printed and provided.
- [02D-01-5] Working containers of food removed from original container not identified by common name. Bulk sugar and flour containers under prep table not labeled.
- [08B-12-5] Stored food not covered. Tray of flan in walk in cooler not covered.
- [14-20-4] Ripped/worn tin foil used as shelf cover. Foil on shelf under prep table in kitchen ripped.
- [31B-02-4] No paper towels or mechanical hand drying device provided at handwash sink. At hand sink by dish area. Employee replaced.
- [50-17-3] Operating with an expired Division of Hotels and Restaurants license. Expired Dec. 1, 2025
- [51-13-4] No Heimlich maneuver/choking sign posted. Bulletin printed and provided.
- [41-17-4] Spray bottle containing toxic substance not labeled. Unknown substance in spray bottle at bar.
- [12B-07-4] Employee beverage container on a food preparation table or over/next to clean equipment/utensils. Employee coffee cup at large fliptop cooler in kitchen. Employee removed cup.
- [53B-13-5] Proof of required state approved employee training not available for some employees. To order approved program food safety material, call DBPR contracted provider: Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association (SafeStaff) 866-372-7233. No proof of training for employee hired more than 60 days.
- [22-49-4] Dishmachine not sanitizing properly. Discontinue use of dishmachine for sanitizing and set up manual sanitization until dishmachine is repaired and sanitizing properly. Sanitizer pump not operating during cycles or manually. Advised employee to set up sanitizer sink for later service.
What do locals think?
Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.
Would you eat here?
MOO! has a rough inspection history. Would you risk it?
A rough inspection history changes the conversation. This vote is a quick read on community trust.
One vote per device. Results update after you vote.
More places worth comparing
If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.
Join the discussion
Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.
Add your take in under a minute
Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.
Enter the 6-digit code sent to
Helpful comments beat hot takes.
Loading comments…
No comments yet — be the first person to add useful context.