Sign in to watch restaurants and track them on your watchlist.
Failing Health Score
How is this score calculated? โ Need help reading this? Newest inspection first. Red dots matter most.
The score is the shortcut, but the inspection timeline is the proof. Start with the newest visit, then scan for repeat critical or major findings.
MR Q CRAB HOUSE in HOLLYWOOD currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 36.2 out of 100 โ an F grade โ a serious pattern of repeat or critical violations. This restaurant has been inspected 8 times from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on October 2, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 58 total violations โ 16 critical, 12 major, 30 minor.
Start with the newest inspection
Use the score as a shortcut, then verify the latest DBPR record and nearby options.
What stands out in this inspection history
The latest inspection on October 2, 2026 shows 11 observation rows: 4 critical, 1 major, and 6 minor.
DBPR source + data confidenceWhatโs powering this page
InspectFL turns public DBPR records into a scan-friendly timeline. Use the official DBPR link when you want to verify the newest inspection at the source. InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When exact inspector notes are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.
- โขInspector notes appear inline when available.
- โขThe official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Open the place or verify the recordSee the place, then share or verify
What do locals think?
Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then add what you actually saw.
Would you eat here?
MR Q CRAB HOUSE has a rough inspection history. Would you risk it?
A rough inspection history changes the conversation. This vote is a quick read on community trust.
One vote per device. Results update after you vote.
*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.
Inspection History
Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.
Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.
- Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
- [02C-04-5] Operator is not properly tracking/marking the number of days ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared onsite was held at refrigeration temperatures prior to freezing in order to properly date mark the food when it is thawed and held at refrigeration temperatures again. Portioned gumbo in left fliptop lower cooler has no date marking when removed from freezer.
- [14-11-5] Equipment in poor repair. 1) Tops of multiple chest freezers rusted. 2) Gaskets on right fliptop lower cooler for damaged.
- [50-09-4] Current Hotel and Restaurant license not displayed.
- [08B-12-5] Stored food not covered. Trays of raw shucked oysters in walk in cooler not covered.
- [22-45-4] Food-contact surfaces not sanitized after cleaning, before use. Do not use equipment/utensils not properly sanitized. Employee washed and rinsed bowls and immediately placed on shelf without conducting sanitizing step. Stopped employee and had him set up dish machine to redo bowls and sanitize.
- [36-03-4] Cove molding at floor/wall juncture broken/missing. Missing molding on wall by kitchen entrance.
- [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. In right fliptop upper area, raw lobster tails (40-54F - Cold Holding). Observed lobster over stacked in container above chill line. Per employee not prepared or portioned today and up in unit approximately 1 hour. Employee removed over stacked portion and placed in lower cooler to rechill.
- [12A-13-4] Employee handled soiled equipment or utensils and then engaged in food preparation, handled clean equipment or utensils, or touched unwrapped single-service items without washing hands. Employee washed, rinsed, and loaded items into dish machine and failed to wash hands before removing items. Discussed with manager to translate to employee proper procedures for handwashing and employee washed hands going forward.
- [12B-02-4] Employee eating in a food preparation or other restricted area. Employee eating next to prep area while employee shucking raw oysters at back of kitchen. Employee left kitchen area to finish eating.
- [25-02-4] Unwrapped single-service utensils not presented so that only the handles are touched. Plastic forks and spoons in test at front counter not presented with handles facing same direction. Employee rearranged to present properly.
- [08A-05-6] Raw animal food stored over/not properly separated from ready-to-eat food. Open bag of raw chicken in top of sauce bucket in walk in cooler. Employee moved bag onto of raw chicken cases.
Own or manage a business?
FairScore is a separate free beta for business owners who want a fairer way to understand online reviewer behavior.
FairScore does not change InspectFL scores, inspection data, rankings, or coverage.
More places worth comparing
If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.
Similar Seafood in HOLLYWOOD
Use these as a same-category comparison set so you can judge this score against nearby alternatives, not in isolation.
Other options in HOLLYWOOD
If you're just looking for a better place nearby, start here and compare the current scores before you decide where to go next.
Join the discussion
Seen this place in person? Share what stood out โ cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.
Add your take in under a minute
Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.
Enter the 6-digit code sent to
Helpful comments beat hot takes.
Loading commentsโฆ
No comments yet โ be the first person to add useful context.