RANCHITO MI PERU IV
9636 SW 77 AVE, MIAMI, FL 33156
License #2322210
🫔 Latin American ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurateSign in to watch restaurants and track them on your watchlist.
Mixed Health Record
How is this score calculated? →RANCHITO MI PERU IV in MIAMI currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 81.7 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on December 22, 2025. Across those visits, inspectors documented 42 total violations — 8 critical, 7 major, 27 minor.
Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern
The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.
What stands out in this inspection history
The latest inspection on December 22, 2025 shows 26 observation rows: 6 critical, 3 major, and 17 minor.
What’s powering this page
InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When exact inspector notes are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.
- •Inspector notes appear inline when available.
- •The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
See the place, then share or verify
*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.
Inspection History
Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.
Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.
- Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
- [01B-02-5] Stop Sale issued on time/temperature control for safety food due to temperature abuse. Observed reach in at front counter with ambient temp of 51F. The following tcs foods stored inside since prior day: tres leches (46F - Cold Holding); rice pudding (50F - Cold Holding)
- [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Observed reach in at front counter with ambient temp of 51F. The following tcs foods stored inside since prior day: tres leches (46F - Cold Holding); rice pudding (50F - Cold Holding)
- [22-02-4] Food-contact surface soiled with food debris, mold-like substance or slime. Observed soiled food and dish shelves.
- [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. Observed soiled gaskets in reach in cooler.
- [31A-11-4] Handwash sink used for purposes other than handwashing. Observed chemical spray stored in hand sink in kitchen area. Operator removed during inspection. Observed blender inside hand sink at front counter.
- [42-01-4] Wet mop not stored in a manner to allow the mop to dry. Observed mop stored in bucket; not in use.
- [08B-38-4] Food stored on floor. Observed cases of rice on floor outside of restroom. Observed sweet potato case on floor in kitchen. Operator put sweet potato away during inspection.
- [25-05-4] Single-service articles improperly stored. Observed cases of forks on floor at front counter. Operator placed on shelf during inspection.
- [51-18-6] No copy of latest inspection report available. Observed no copy of last report printed on site.
- [53B-10-4] Records/documents for required employee training do not contain all of the required information. Observed Raul missing DOB on certificate.
- [50-09-4] Current Hotel and Restaurant license not displayed. Observed old license printed on display; 10/24.
- [36-36-4] Ceiling tile missing. Observed missing tile outside of restroom.
- [14-33-4] Reach-in cooler shelves with rust that has pitted the surface. Observed in both reach in coolers.
- [40-06-5] Employee personal items stored in or above a food preparation area, food, clean equipment and utensils, or single-service items. Observed phone on prep table in kitchen area.
- [14-20-4] Ripped/worn tin foil used as shelf cover. Observed on rack where utensils are held.
- [08A-17-6] Raw animal foods not properly separated from one another based upon minimum required cooking temperature when stored in a freezer - not all products commercially packaged. Observed pork and beef in ziplocks stored with veggies and fries in chest freezer.
- [41-10-4] Toxic substance/chemical improperly stored. Observed Clorox spray stored in hand sink in kitchen. Operator removed during inspection.
- [36-32-5] Ceiling/ceiling tile shows damage or is in disrepair. Observed in dining area; water damage.
- [36-17-5] Floor tiles missing and/or in disrepair. Observed cracked tiles in kitchen.
- [14-11-5] Equipment in poor repair. Observed inside walk in cooler; exit door handle missing.
- [14-06-4] Wood food-contact surface not properly sealed. Observed on dry food and single service racks.
- [41-07-4] Container of medicine improperly stored. Observed bottle of vitamins stored on rack with seasonings in kitchen.
- [14-69-4] Ice buildup in reach-in freezer and/or walk-in freezer. Observed in all reach in freezers.
- [08A-05-6] Raw animal food stored over/not properly separated from ready-to-eat food. Observed case of raw pork on top of bottles of water. Operator placed on food shelf.
- [14-74-7] Cold holding equipment not maintained in good repair. Do not store time/temperature control for safety food in this unit until the unit is repaired. Observed reach in at front counter with ambient temp of 51F. The following tcs foods stored inside since prior day: tres leches (46F - Cold Holding); rice pudding (50F - Cold Holding)
- [36-34-5] Ceiling/ceiling tiles/vents soiled with accumulated food debris, grease, dust, or mold-like substance. Observed air vents soiled with dust.
What do locals think?
Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.
Would you eat here?
RANCHITO MI PERU IV has some meaningful issues on record. Would you still eat here?
This is where the context matters most — some people will still eat there, others will want cleaner inspections first.
One vote per device. Results update after you vote.
More places worth comparing
If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.
Similar Latin American in MIAMI
Use these as a same-category comparison set so you can judge this score against nearby alternatives, not in isolation.
Other options in MIAMI
If you're just looking for a better place nearby, start here and compare the current scores before you decide where to go next.
Join the discussion
Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.
Add your take in under a minute
Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.
Enter the 6-digit code sent to
Helpful comments beat hot takes.
Loading comments…
No comments yet — be the first person to add useful context.