🪰515,480 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

SR CEVICHE JAX BEACH

229 3 ST, NEPTUNE BEACH, FL 32266

License #2616149

🫔 Latin American ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

SR CEVICHE JAX BEACH in NEPTUNE BEACH currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 90.4 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has 3 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on January 12, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 18 total violations — 5 critical, 1 major, 12 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
67%
Imported observations
18
Coverage note
Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
  • When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Administrative complaint recommended
  • [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Observed in reach in cooler on a plate on top of pans located on cook line Cooked calamari (65F - Cold Holding); Cooked mussels (65F-67F - Cold Holding). Employee stated it was a mistake. Employee removed and stored properly in reach in cooler.
  • [31B-04-4] No handwashing sign provided at a hand sink used by food employees. Observed no handwashing sign at employee hand washing sink at entrance of kitchen. Inspector will send copy of employee handwashing sign.
  • [06-01-5] Time/temperature control for safety food thawed in an improper manner. Observed frozen calamari in sink of water. Employee turned water on frozen calamari.
  • [42-01-4] Wet mop not stored in a manner to allow the mop to dry. Observed wet mop stored in mop bucket. Employee removed and hung to dry properly.
  • [14-01-5] Bowl or other container with no handle used to dispense food. Observed in reach in cooler stainless cups without handles used to portion raw fish. Employee removed from container.
  • [01B-13-4] Stop Sale issued due to food not being in a wholesome, sound condition. Observed Completely thawed Commercially processed reduced oxygen packaged Mahi in stand alone cooler still in packaging. See stop sale
  • [10-08-5] Ice scoop handle in contact with ice. Observed ice scoop handle in contact with ice in ice machine. Employee removed and stored properly.
  • [13-07-4] Employee wearing jewelry other than a plain ring on their hands/arms while preparing food. Observed employee engaging in food preparation wearing a bracelet.
  • [40-06-5] Employee personal items stored in or above a food preparation area, food, clean equipment and utensils, or single-service items. Observed employee personal items stored on equipment in ware washing area. Employee removed and stored properly.
  • [08A-05-6] Raw animal food stored over/not properly separated from ready-to-eat food. Observed in stand alone cooler in kitchen raw shell eggs stored over ready to eat dressing. Employee removed and stored properly.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

SR CEVICHE JAX BEACH looks fairly solid on paper. Would you eat here?

B record

Solid overall, with enough history that people may still weigh the details differently.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.