🪰515,480 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

UMA

16395 BISCAYNE BLVD STE 101, NORTH MIAMI BEACH, FL 33160

License #2338287

Quick take

UMA in NORTH MIAMI BEACH currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 57.8 out of 100 — an F grade — a serious pattern of repeat or critical violations. This restaurant has 3 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on March 3, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 43 total violations — 3 critical, 11 major, 29 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Imported observations
43
Coverage note
Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
  • When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Call Back - Complied
  • [08A-05-6] Observed raw chicken stored overcooked rice in reach in cooler under flat grill.
  • [14-01-5] Bowl with no handle used to dispense cooked white rice.
  • [51-11-4] Carbon dioxide/helium tanks not adequately secured.
  • [24-05-4] Clean pots and pans not stored inverted or in a protected manner.
  • [24-07-4] Cleaned and sanitized pots stored on floor in kitchen area.
  • [06-09-1] Commercially processed reduced oxygen packaged raw tuna bearing a label indicating that it is to remain frozen until time of use no longer frozen and not removed from reduced oxygen package.
  • [40-06-5] Employee drinks stored clean equipment and utensils.
  • [14-11-5] Equipment in poor repair. Observed reach in cooler gaskets torn.
  • [10-17-4] In-use knife/knives stored in cracks between pieces of prep table and reach in cooler.
  • [10-07-4] In-use utensil stored in standing water less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit.
  • [08B-38-4] Observed various cases of foods stored on floor in walk in cooler/ freezer.
  • [06-01-5] Observed various raw fish thawing at room temperature on food cart next to back door.
  • [16-46-4] Old labels stuck to food containers after cleaning.
  • [03A-02-5] Observed sushi rice cold held at 53F. Sushi rice had no time marking. Per chef sushi rice had only been out for about 2 hours prior to start of inspection and is held at room temperature.
  • [31A-09-4] Handwash sink not accessible for employee use at all times due to utensils being stored inside. Chef removed.
  • [31B-02-4] No paper towels or mechanical hand drying device provided at handwash sink.
  • [03F-10-5] Observed No written procedures available for use of time as a public health control for sushi rice. Per chef sushi rice is held at room temperature. Explained time as of public health control to operator and provided form to be filled out.
  • [31A-11-4] Observed employee using handwash sink to rinse wiping cloth in kitchen area and handwash sink in bar area used as dump sink.
  • [02B-01-5] Observed establishment offering various raw fish items. However menu does not identify which items contain raw or undercooked animal foods covered by the consumer advisory.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

UMA has a rough inspection history. Would you risk it?

F record

A rough inspection history changes the conversation. This vote is a quick read on community trust.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.