🪰515,480 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

WILD GINGER

60 GARDEN ST S, PALM COAST, FL 32137

License #2800607

🍱 Japanese/Sushi ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

WILD GINGER in PALM COAST currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 88.4 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has 3 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on January 29, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 26 total violations — 5 critical, 6 major, 15 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
67%
Imported observations
26
Coverage note
Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
  • When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Administrative complaint recommended
  • [01C-03-4] Clam/mussel/oyster tags not marked with last date served. Observed No tags with January or December date mark. Observed approximately 6 tags missing date mark. Discussed with person in charge. Provided hand out.
  • [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. Observed flip-top cooler gaskets on wok cook line soiled with food debris. Observed glass door reach in cooler gaskets soiled with food debris.
  • [02A-01-5] Raw or undercooked oysters offered and establishment has no consumer advisory sign provided on wall, menu, placard, table tent or by any other written means. Raw animal foods must be fully cooked prior to service. Observed no oyster specific consumer advisory for raw oysters advertised on menu. Provided paper and emailed copy to person in charge and they posted at point of sale.
  • [10-07-4] In-use utensil stored in standing water less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Observed utensils in standing water 89F. Discussed with person in charge and they dumped water.
  • [14-01-5] Bowl or other container with no handle used to dispense food. Observed bowl used to scoop rice without handle. Discussed with person in charge. Person in charge removed all bowls from bulk food items.
  • [21-12-4] Wet wiping cloth not stored in sanitizing solution between uses. Observed wet wiping cloth stored on spray bottle at bar. Discussed with person in charge.
  • [31A-11-4] Handwash sink used for purposes other than handwashing. Observed hand washing stations used to rinse vegetables and fill pitcher with water. Discussed with person in charge.
  • [22-08-4] Interior of oven/microwave has accumulation of black substance/grease/food debris. Observed interior of microwave soiled with food debris.
  • [08B-38-4] Food stored on floor. Observed cases of food in cardboard boxes stored on floor of walk-in freezer.
  • [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Observed cooked red potatoes and corn on cob (89F - Cold Holding); fried krab sticks (77F - Cold Holding) left on prep tables on cook line for approximately three hours per person in charge. Person in charge had employees place all on ice.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

WILD GINGER looks fairly solid on paper. Would you eat here?

B record

Solid overall, with enough history that people may still weigh the details differently.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.