🪰515,480 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

EL PALACIO DEL MOFONGO, LLC

10107 SOUTHERN BLVD, ROYAL PALM BEACH, FL 33411

License #6019302

🫔 Latin American ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

EL PALACIO DEL MOFONGO, LLC in ROYAL PALM BEACH currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 76.2 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on February 17, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 13 total violations — 6 critical, 2 major, 5 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Imported observations
13
Coverage note
Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
  • When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [02C-02-5] Ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared onsite and held more than 24 hours not properly date marked. At walk in cooler, several food items prepared onsite and held over 24 hours without proper date marking. Advised operator of proper date marking.
  • [08A-20-5] Raw animal foods not properly separated from each other in holding unit based upon minimum required cooking temperature. At walk in cooler, Raw chicken stored over raw pork. Advised operator of proper storage. Operator stored correctly.
  • [12A-13-4] Employee handled soiled equipment or utensils and then engaged in food preparation, handled clean equipment or utensils, or touched unwrapped single-service items without washing hands. Employee used soiled wiping cloth then proceeded to handle clean equipment without washing hands. Advised operator of proper hand washing.
  • [22-45-4] Food-contact surfaces not sanitized after cleaning, before use. Do not use equipment/utensils not properly sanitized. At cook line, employee used soiled wiping cloth to wipe in use knife without proper sanitizing. Advised operator to not use equipment until properly sanitized.
  • [41-15-5] Wiping cloth solution exceeding the maximum concentration allowed stored in a location that could result in the cross contamination of food, equipment, utensils, linens, single-service, or single-use articles. At dish area, Sanitizer Bucket (Chlorine 200+ppm), exceeding maximum concentration allowed. Operator diluted solution to Chlorine 100ppm.
  • [03B-01-6] Time/temperature control for safety food, other than whole meat roast, hot held at less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit. At cook line, cooked ground pork (76F - Hot Holding). Per operator, the item held out of temperature approximately 1 1/3 ht. Advised operator to reheat item to 165F.
  • [10-08-5] Ice scoop handle in contact with ice. At wait station, ice scoop handle in ice. Operator removed.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

EL PALACIO DEL MOFONGO, LLC has some meaningful issues on record. Would you still eat here?

C record

This is where the context matters most — some people will still eat there, others will want cleaner inspections first.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.