🪰515,480 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

PHO 79 V

9503 S DIXIE HWY, PINECREST, FL 33156

License #2315903

🍽️ Thai/Vietnamese ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

PHO 79 V in PINECREST currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 44 out of 100 — an F grade — a serious pattern of repeat or critical violations. This restaurant has 3 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on January 28, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 66 total violations — 18 critical, 6 major, 42 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Imported observations
66
Coverage note
Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
  • When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [14-33-4] Reach-in cooler shelves with rust that has pitted the surface. Observed in reach in cooler at waiter station.
  • [36-73-4] Floor soiled/has accumulation of debris. Observed in walk in freezer.
  • [40-06-5] Employee personal items stored in or above a food preparation area, food, clean equipment and utensils, or single-service items. Observed bags stored above beer on rack in waiter station.
  • [41-07-4] Container of medicine improperly stored. Observed burn cream above dishes on rack across cook line. Cream was removed from kitchen.
  • [29-42-4] Vacuum breaker missing at mop sink faucet or on fitting/splitter added to mop sink faucet. Observed at mop sink.
  • [36-17-5] Floor tiles missing and/or in disrepair. Observed throughout kitchen.
  • [51-13-4] No Heimlich maneuver/choking sign posted. Observed no poster; inspector provided via email.
  • [08B-38-4] Food stored on floor. Observed at front counter; cases of powder for teas.
  • [12B-07-4] Employee beverage container on a food preparation table or over/next to clean equipment/utensils. Observed across cook line above prep table. Operator removed.
  • [11-27-4] Establishment has no written procedures for employees to follow in response to a vomiting or diarrheal event where the vomit or diarrhea is discharged onto surfaces in the establishment. Observed no clean up form or kit; inspector provided via email.
  • [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Observed container of Bean sprouts (48F - Cold Holding). As per operator, less than 4 hours. Operator added more ice to water.
  • [29-34-4] Vacuum breaker missing at hose bibb or on fitting/splitter added to hose bibb. Observed next to triple sink.
  • [22-16-4] Reach-in cooler interior/shelves have accumulation of soil residues. Observed reach in at waiter station.
  • [08A-05-6] Raw animal food stored over/not properly separated from ready-to-eat food. Observed raw shell egg over cooked pork in reach in across fryer. Operator corrected during inspection.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

PHO 79 V has a rough inspection history. Would you risk it?

F record

A rough inspection history changes the conversation. This vote is a quick read on community trust.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.